How does one select the best piping plan? API 682 4th Edition provides guidance in the form of flow charts. Although these flowcharts (Sheets 7, 8 and 9 of Annex A) appear to be somewhat imposing at first glance, they are actually relatively straightforward and consistent.
Even without the benefit of the API flow charts, selection of the proper piping plan is relatively simple. For example, the most popular arrangement is a single seal and most single seals use Plan 11. Most Arrangement 2 liquid systems use a basic Plan 52 and most Arrangement 3 liquid systems use a basic Plan 53A. The outline below almost (but not exactly) summarizes Sheets 7, 8 and 9 of API 682 4th Edition Annex A:
- Arrangement 1 (single seal)
- Arrangement 2 (“tandem” seal)
- Arrangement 3 (“double” seal)
- Special considerations for piping plans
- Process fluid considerations
- Hot water – use Plan 23
- Hot or flashing fluids – change to Plan 23 for inner seal
- Dirty fluids – change to Plan 31 or 32 for inner seal
- Crystallizing or coking fluids – add steam quench if Arrangement 1
- Leakage monitoring
- Leakage management
- Arrangement 1 (single seals) – use Plan 65 or 66
- Arrangement 2 (tandem seals)
- Plan 52 includes management (if piped to disposal)
- Plan 71 or 72 needs Plan 75 or 76
- Arrangement 3 (double seals) does not include leakage management
API Sheets 7, 8 and 9 each include all three arrangements and are for
- Sheet 7 – non-hydrocarbons
- Sheet 8 – non-flashing hydrocarbons
- Sheet 9 – flashing hydrocarbons.
The following flow charts on SealFAQs are variations of the API Sheets but are grouped as follows:
- Non-hydrocarbon services
- Non-flashing hydrocarbon service
- Flashing hydrocarbon service
- All services
- Chart 7 – Arrangement 3.
All of the above are really just guidelines and suggestions. Variations are not uncommon. The user should consider the API 682 descriptions carefully before finalizing the piping plan.